Page 20 of 20 FirstFirst ... 10181920
Results 191 to 195 of 195

Thread: A Question for Clubsprint

  1. #191

    Default

    Oh god , that poor little girl
    GageDesign Pet Photography
    Site still in construction so will post link when it's finished.

  2. #192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ricey View Post
    Clubsprint has a kelpie? I didn't know that.

    How irresponsible of him/her!

    Everyone knows what a dangerous breed the kelpie is. That's probably something to do with the fact that the kelpie was bred (inter alia) from the dingo, and dingos eat babies . Just ask Lindy about that.

    So clubsprint has a kelpie; obviously a bad choice for someone who likes to put the boot into anyone who has a dog that the Murdoch press doesn't like. Does clubsprint also have a clubsprint? (the clubsprint was an awful piece of turd Ford Capri turbo from the 90's that was universally reviled by any motoring journalist that had the misfortune to be made to drive it). It handled badly, it leaked, and it was unreliable. I guess thats why Ford called it the clubsprint. Kind of apt, really.

    Regards,

    ricey
    What I said about those that run out of language also applies to intelligence.

  3. #193

    Default

    I have a kelpie cross too Ricey.

    It's not about banning any breed. It's about holding people responsible for their animals behaviour and enforcing that responsibility. It doesn't matter what breed it is, any dog can bite and if the circumstances are right (well wrong, but you know what I mean) any dog can kill.

    Frankly I believe it is extremely niave to leave any dog unattended with any child or any person who is not a member of the family for that matter.

    I've never been annoyed with clubsprint for wanting lower bite stats - but wanting to ban any breed will NOT address any issues.

  4. #194
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    203

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AngelanBatty View Post
    I have a kelpie cross too Ricey.

    It's not about banning any breed. It's about holding people responsible for their animals behaviour and enforcing that responsibility. It doesn't matter what breed it is, any dog can bite and if the circumstances are right (well wrong, but you know what I mean) any dog can kill.
    I think they were going for a bit of irony. Please don't take offence, I'm sure they didn't mean it like that, they were trying to get their own point across in an ironic .. slightly subtle way ... if not a little immature
    "In order to really enjoy a dog, one doesn't merely try to train him to be semihuman. The point of it is to open oneself to the possibility of becoming partly a dog." - Edward Hoagland

  5. #195

    Default

    Not offended and I completely understood the point, but I've been watching people take it all way too seriously, so I thought I should clarify

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •