Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: When is a Pit Bull Not a Pit Bull

  1. #1

    Default When is a Pit Bull Not a Pit Bull

    Been posted all over the place, but not here yet

    Dogs Queensland | CCC(Q)

    MEDIA RELEASE - When is a Pit Bull not a Pit Bull?
    7 April 2010

    Dogs Queensland Media Release 7th April 2010

    When is a Pit Bull not a Pit Bull?

    The Honourable Justice Martin, when considering the evidence presented in the Supreme Court of Queensland yesterday, in the application brought by Ms Kylie Chivers in respect to her dog “Tango” against the Gold Coast City Council, decided that her American Staffordshire Terrier (commonly called an AmStaff) is in fact an American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT).

    Pedigreed, registered dogs owned and bred by Dogs Queensland members include AmStaffs and these dogs have many generations of recorded registered pedigree data and are bred specifically for improving type and temperament. These dogs are now far removed from what the community considers to be the typical Pit Bull.

    The Australian Government decided to restrict the importation of APBTs in 1956 as many had been bred to work and in some instances (particularly in the United States) that included fighting and it was believed that these dogs would therefore constitute a greater risk to people. This decision has been the subject of much criticism by dog enthusiasts over many years because it is generally believed that breeds should not be banned but the actions by small numbers of aggressive dogs should be penalised. In other words, ban the deed and not the breed.

    AmStaffs, whilst originating from a similar genetic background, were developed with an entirely different objective. That objective was to produce a well socialised sound dog suitable to urban living. Our responsible Dogs Queensland member / breeders have worked tirelessly over many years to achieve this objective working at all times within a clearly defined breed standard.

    The American Staffordshire Terrier breed is recognised internationally and this unexpected decision seems to be contrary to all of the evidence that Genetic Technologies Ltd (a well respected and highly regarded Human Forensic and Animal Genetics & Diagnostics firm) has collected.

    GTG maintains that “they are confident and can conclude that the breed signature for APBT is different to that of the AmStaff.”

    This decision has significant and far reaching implications for our responsible AmStaff member breeders and exactly how this decision will affect our members and their internationally recognised breed of pure bred, registered dog is still unclear.

    CCC (Q) t/as Dogs Queensland is seeking urgent talks with the relevant State Government Minister(s) to discuss the possible ramifications of this Supreme Court decision.

    We are confident that those talks will result in a positive and manageable outcome for our members and their pedigreed registered American Staffordshire Terrier dogs.
    I am doing Relay For Life in 2011, please contact me to make a donation

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    South Australia


    Thanks mate lets hope it turns out ok!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Lala Land!!!


    Here is the aca link if anyone is interested
    Half a million dollar dog fight on MSN Video

    Breeding, Showing, Training and general crazy making!!!
    If you seek understanding listen to the music, not the song.

  4. #4


    They'd want to be carefull with GTC/Gribbles. It could come unstuck very veryeasily, unless they are talking primarily about ancesteral DNA.
    If you find yourself going through hell; Don't stay. Just keep on going.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts